|
|
|
GROUP 1 (TOP 5)
- Friction model: combined with RWIS and weather and maintenance activities – “PULP FRICTION” – Pub
- In-Vehicle Information: about speed, road conditions and traffic situation combined information from maintenance activities with road weather information – Waste –
- Free all weather data: free geospatial data, free data platforms “FREEDATA”– Ready
- Personal Filtering: Collect information about users: age, state of health, car type, status, and create intelligent algorithm that will find the interesting data for him/her (e.g. pollution, allergias), compare: eCall, MyRoute – Pub
- Animals on Road: fasten device that can be shooted on moose, showing their location (GPS-GALILEO) + central data analysis and delivery – Waste
WACSVOD ANALYSIS *) OF THE 5 TOP IDEAS
|
|
FRICTION MODEL – MONITORING, MODELLING, FORECASTING
|
IN-VEHICLE INFOR-MATION
|
FREE WEATHER DATA
|
PERSONAL FILTERING
|
ANIMALS ON ROAD
|
|
W
Weak Signals
|
it is complicated subject or object: how to define it simply. We need more definition on friction
|
handled in group 2
|
money – somebody wants to have money not to pay
|
user interfaces should be safe ad usable, not cause more accidents
|
difficult to monitor
|
|
A
Actors
|
authorities, researchers, manufacturers, funding sector all together, need of new co-operative activity
|
|
data owners and data producers
|
car manufacturers
|
device developers
|
|
C
Collaborators
|
data owners
|
|
governments
|
data producers, researchers, car manufacturers
|
road authorities
|
|
S
Structures
|
development of data bases, joint project of the friction model
|
|
data bases, data stores
|
data bases, data communication, co-operative transport sector
|
monitoring system
|
|
V
Values
|
new good information for different purposes, safe and smooth transport services
|
|
could be very high
|
safer driving, especially older people
|
safer driving
|
|
O
Obstacles
|
money and complicated problem
|
|
money
|
too much information inside the car, too much technology in car
|
difficult to monitor
|
|
D
Drivers
|
optimal maintenance operations, safety on the road
|
|
free data for different users and value-added service producers
|
increasing number of aging people, safe driving
|
eager device developers
|
GROUP 2 (TOP 4)
- Automatic Traffic MIS (management information system) - Wild
- Smart location finder for personal services – new issues e.g. nearest toilet “TOILET-TOMTOM”- Pub
- Social Mobility information and contact system - Pub
- Multimodal Routing System adaptive / learning personal traffic, mobile route selection – Pub – see group 1
WACSVOD ANALYSIS OF THE 4 TOP IDEAS
|
|
AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEM
|
SMART LOCATION FINDER
|
SOCIAL MOBILITY INFO CONTACT SYSTEM
|
MULTIMODAL ROUTING SYSTEM FOR NON- MOTORISED MODES
|
|
W
Weak Signals
|
lack of cooperations, size of monolithic databases
|
competition, technology
|
technology, climate
|
safety, vulnerability
|
|
A
Actors
|
drivers/customers
|
drivers/customers, service providers
|
government, individual drivers, companies
|
cyclists, pedestrians, government, safety institution, operators, insurance
|
|
C
Collaborators
|
government
|
users/consumers, map providers, government
|
community organisation, government, individual drivers, companies (travel plans)
|
bicycle organisations, educational organisations, government, volunteers
|
|
S
Structures
|
sensors, datawarehouse, realtime needs, standards
|
open database, interface
|
legislation, taxation
|
dynamic information , collaboration, communication, micro-climate info database
|
|
V
Values
|
realtime targeted information, road safety, accurate prognosis, less energy consumption
|
less time waste, location visibility, quality of data
|
lower cost lower environmental costs, social impact
|
encouragement to non-motorised transport
|
|
O
Obstacles
|
lack of sensor / actual for data standards
|
cooperation from DB owners
|
privacy /cultural, safety, legal liability
|
good network data is missing
|
|
D
Drivers
|
Drivers/consumers, entrepreneurs
|
Open data (collaboration, user-driven)
|
Climate costs idealism
|
Encouragement of motorcyclists, insurance
|
Others:
- Fellow Driver Service - Wild
- Car2Infrastructure Communication - Wild
- MyMobile travel manager - Wild
- USA 511 for Europe - Ready
- Information on Eco-Efficiency – while planning – while driving - Pub
- Social Eguality Issues: age, gender, language – Pub
GROUP 3 (TOP 6)
- Eye from above: traffic information from satellites, unmanned planes, helicopters, balloons, aircrafts; meteoinfo from satellites – Wild
- Urban data fusion for a better traffic intormation, Traffic forecast models – Pub,
- Mobile sensor data acquisition: Mobile phones as sensors – Ready
- Cross Border Weather Alerts – Ready – Weather and traffic information through mobile phones
- Mapping of risky road stretches - Waste
- European databases – Pub – see group 4
WACSVOD – General problems
Ready-to-go ideas are for sure, no weak signals, but work is needed with information providers
Scattered data problematic -> in future traffic information is independent on administrations
Value: legal obstacles
Datawars?
Drivers: demands are growing, more satellites in the future?
Obstacles: creating models becomes unfeasible
Others: eCall and airport weather observations – Waste
GROUP 4 (TOP 4)
- Weather Wikipedia – weatherwiki for roadweather; road weather data - Waste
- EUROADMAP – Northern Europe Module (NEM) for mapping road weather conditions online – Wild (NEM Pub) – (Conceptual)– see group 3
- Mobile Pocket Guidebook with position services – all traffic modes – Ready, see group 2
- EYEAR: Road Eye: friction data collection and transmission (acoustic, optical, invehicle etc.) – Ready
WACSVOD ANALYSIS OF THE 4 TOP IDEAS
|
|
EYEAR
|
MOBILE POCKET GUIDE
|
EUROADMAP
|
WEATHER WIKI
|
|
W
Weak Signals
|
variety of data, different methods
|
lack of some data, variety of sources
|
availability of data, access to data cost?
|
variability in data quality? Stakeholders?
|
|
A
Actors
|
manufacturers of equipments, road authorities, transport operators
|
meteorological institutes, authorities, operators (transport, tele) service providers, pedestrians, cyclists, passengers, event makers
|
people and companies and road authorities and meteorologists with interest, national weather services, private weather companies
|
we don’t know the actors: end-users, manufacturers, authorities, ?
|
|
C
Collaborators
|
sensors in vehicles, vehicle info
|
same without users
|
as above plus various others
|
meteorological institute
|
|
S
Structures
|
safety for road users
|
observation network, internet, mobiles, telenetwork
|
internet based road weather map (e.g. google map), computer networking, weather service – road authorities
|
www
|
|
V
Values
|
lack of validation
|
optimize travelling time etc. pre-planning of trips, increase safety (slippery), healthy savings, environment (traffic mode)
|
safety, environment, cost for traveller, traveller information, info for freight transport
|
social wellbeing, efficient use of existing information
|
|
O
obstacles
|
government
|
lack of data, willingness to pay? price, business model
|
competition between actors, open interfaces
|
false reality?
|
|
D
Drivers
|
variety of data, different methods
|
city councils, ageing population, climate change, environment issues
|
|
peoples willingness to help: cheap dynamic develop-ment. NB: data to be deliv-ered in graphical form only! i.e. not digital -> quality issue
|
Others:
- Everything that moves gives location information – Passive Transmission of data – Wild
- Satellite data and traffic structures – Pub
- PORT-related traffic modelling – Ready
- Dynamic driving trip services – Waste
- Multipurpose use of GPS-based road tolling – Ready
- Data collection from Electronic Ticketing System – Ready
- Satellite data; Airport Weather observations – see group 3 – Ready, Pub
- User interface development – consider social issues: age, language, ecology, equality “RTFM” – Pub, Wild
*)
WACSVOD Analysis - issues to be
discussed about each idea
- W=Weak
Signals - what are those happenings
that might disrupt or
change the development
path of the idea in the future?
- A= Actors -
Who are the main actors of realising the idea?
- C=
Collaborators - Who are the main collaborators in realising the idea?
- S= Structures
- What are the main (infra)structures needed for the idea?
- V= Values -
What is the value (monetary/operational/etc.) or added-value for
beneficiaries of the
idea?
- O=Obstacles -
What are the main obstacles hindering the realisation of the idea?
- D= Drivers -
What are the main drivers promoting the realisation of the idea?
|
Last modified at 6/30/2008 1:14 PM by Auli Keskinen
|
|
|
|